🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are pouring enormous sums into what is known as “sovereign AI” – creating national machine learning technologies. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are racing to develop AI that understands native tongues and local customs.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This trend is an element in a wider global competition spearheaded by large firms from the US and the People's Republic of China. While companies like a leading AI firm and a social media giant invest enormous capital, developing countries are likewise making their own gambles in the AI field.

However given such huge investments at stake, can smaller countries achieve significant gains? As noted by a analyst from an influential research institute, If not you’re a rich state or a major company, it’s a significant hardship to build an LLM from nothing.”

National Security Issues

Numerous states are hesitant to depend on foreign AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for instance, US-built AI systems have sometimes proven inadequate. An illustrative instance saw an AI tool employed to educate learners in a distant community – it communicated in English with a pronounced American accent that was difficult to follow for regional students.

Additionally there’s the defence dimension. In India’s military authorities, relying on certain external systems is viewed not permissible. Per an developer commented, “It could have some random data source that might say that, such as, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that particular system in a military context is a serious concern.”

He added, “I have spoken to people who are in the military. They aim to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they are reluctant to rely on Western platforms because information may be transferred overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

Homegrown Efforts

Consequently, several nations are backing local initiatives. One such a effort is being developed in India, wherein a company is attempting to build a national LLM with government support. This project has dedicated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to AI development.

The developer imagines a system that is more compact than leading models from American and Asian tech companies. He states that India will have to compensate for the financial disparity with skill. Located in India, we don’t have the luxury of allocating billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend with such as the enormous investments that the United States is devoting? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge plays a role.”

Native Priority

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is backing language models developed in local native tongues. These particular tongues – including the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and others – are frequently underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I hope the people who are developing these independent AI models were aware of the extent to which and the speed at which the frontier is moving.

A leader engaged in the initiative explains that these tools are created to complement bigger AI, instead of replacing them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he says, often struggle with local dialects and cultural aspects – communicating in awkward the Khmer language, as an example, or suggesting non-vegetarian meals to Malay users.

Creating native-tongue LLMs enables local governments to code in cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful system developed in other countries.

He further explains, “I’m very careful with the concept national. I think what we’re trying to say is we wish to be more adequately included and we wish to comprehend the abilities” of AI systems.

International Partnership

For states trying to find their place in an escalating global market, there’s another possibility: team up. Researchers connected to a well-known university recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative shared among a consortium of middle-income states.

They term the proposal “Airbus for AI”, in reference to the European effective strategy to create a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. This idea would entail the formation of a state-backed AI entity that would combine the capabilities of several states’ AI initiatives – including the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the US and Chinese major players.

The lead author of a study describing the initiative states that the concept has drawn the consideration of AI leaders of at least three states so far, in addition to multiple national AI firms. While it is presently targeting “mid-sized nations”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have likewise shown curiosity.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s simply reality there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of the present White House. People are asking for example, can I still depend on any of this tech? Suppose they decide to